|
|
Newcastle Mini-Conference 2003- AbstractsCompiled and edited by Peter L. Jeffery. AS03003Z PaperNew possibilities: Supervising Fine Art DoctoratesElizabeth Ashburn, University of New South WalesThe study of doctorates in art history and art theory has been available for a considerable time and these degrees are well accepted. While art schools have offered masters research degrees for around twenty years the award of doctorates in the fine arts studio area are even more recent and much less familiar. As such degrees also include a practical studio component with a thesis there is no doubt that this has contributed to concerns regarding the definition of projects, their quality, their supervision and assessment. These fine art studio doctorates provide some new challenges for supervisors as they may be required to supervise both major studio practice and a substantial thesis component. While this supervision can combine elements of traditional doctoral supervision with some aspects of supervision of studio based research master's degrees, I have not found these adequate to accommodate the complexity of fine art doctorates. Many of these doctoral projects are also interdisciplinary in nature and require joint supervision provided from the wider university. This interdisciplinarity provides yet another challenge for supervisors. In this paper I want to consider the exciting opportunities there are in supervising such doctorates and what pedagogical approaches and teaching strategies are emerging. AS03021Z ® PaperRedefining our experiences of research through the integration of multiple perspectives for the development of postgraduate student research capacityHope Ashiabor, Ros Taplin, Mio Bryce, Elizabeth Kefallinos and Anna Reid, Macquarie UniversityThis paper integrates different supervisory models with a view to proposing a framework that will foster a supportive intellectual environment for the supervisor-student relationship. To provide conceptual background to the discussion, the paper reviews some of the existing models for postgraduate research supervision as found in the literature. The paper juxtaposes these models against the experience that we, the authors, have encountered in our supervision of student research, as well as from interviews that we conducted with other supervisors. We argue that although the existing literature sets out multiple models of research supervision, our experience has been that they have been rather prescriptive and apply to specific situations. Here we redefine our experiences through our perception of our disciplinary environment, our perception of the university environment, and our student's perspective. Unfortunately, little attention is paid in the literature to the perspective of the student in the supervision process. We argue that to foster an effective environment in the supervision of student research, there is a need to be aware of the variations in applying supervisory models in practice. There is also a need to be aware of the variations in our student's understanding of the research situation, their educational and cultural backgrounds, their expectations of their outcomes of their study and many other factors. Our proposed framework acknowledges that postgraduate supervision is a symbiotic process where balance is integral to the development of the student as a researcher. BA03006ZTransforming Doctoral ExpectationsRobyn Barnacle, RMIT UniversityPersistent poor results from PREQ and other surveys regarding the quality of the research environment or culture experienced by research degree candidates suggests a hiatus exists between some candidates' expectations of a research degree and their subsequent experience. Perceptions of what a research degree might, or should, be are often in excess of, or incongruent with, what the experience actually has to offer. To what extent does this hiatus reflect the changing nature of the research degree, and the Doctoral degree in particular? How might the emergence of new research models, such as by project, work based, industry linked etc, and other notable factors, such as increasing part-time enrolment and changing demographic characteristics, impact on what candidates' expectations are regarding the experience of doing a PhD? This paper explores these questions through presenting findings from recent studies conducted at RMIT that are aimed at better understanding the research degree candidate experience. The findings from these studies are revealing as to the nature of research candidates' aspirations regarding a research environment. They also provide an insight into how Doctoral candidates characterise what the critical factors are in contributing to, and detracting from, a successful research culture. I explore these findings and speculate on what they reveal about the contemporary PhD experience. BR03012Z ®Exploring the multi-layered experience of undertaking creative Doctoral researchLaura Brearley, RMIT UniversityThis paper explores the emotional and existential dimensions of creative research which are often unacknowledged or unexamined. Its purpose is to deepen understanding about the nature of the non-cognitive aspects of the research experience and explore the implications for students and supervisors. The paper crosses genres and incorporates academic literature, autobiographical narratives, songs and poems within the text. Through the use of multiple voices, I have attempted to reflect the substance and emotional intensity of the research experience and foster an emotional engagement with the data. The paper draws on the literature which examines the experience of research, theories of learning and knowledge creation and epistemological issues of representation in research. The purpose of the paper is to stimulate critical reflection by stretching and dissolving boundaries, in both content and its form. The paper has been written in the hope that it will play to the edge of the possible, challenging aesthetic concepts and also inviting us to be more fully conscious of ourselves and our practice, both as researchers and supervisors. My intention is to contribute to our understanding of the creative doctoral experience beyond the cognitive domain in ways which can ultimately enrich our practice. BR03015Z ® PaperDefining the doctorate with Asian research studentsMio Bryce, Macquarie UniversityThe aim of supervision is to support a student's development to become a competent, autonomous researcher. This requires supervisors to have a wide range of responsibilities, abilities balanced views and practices to deal with intellectual, psychological and cultural issues. The challenge for Asian students is the developing subtly in language, thinking and autonomy. Supervisors should be aware of philosophical and pragmatic levels. First, the magnitude of the language barrier should be recognised as it affects all academic practice; speed of absorption and thinking and quality of comprehension, besides difficulties in academic writing. Second, different ways of thinking should be understood not as cultural and/or personal immaturity, inability but as difference. Third, student's heavy dependence on their supervisors, a serious obstacle for the development of their autonomy, is deeply rooted in their customary perspective and practice that the respect for others is expressed as their full trust and obedience. In short, it is crucial for supervisors to recognise the difference between students capability and intellectual capacity as researcher, their attitude and practice stemming from their culture, and to help students holistic development, not replacing one culture to another, but based on their native culture to nurture their multicultural intellectualities. This paper will discuss the difficulties experienced by Asian research students developing into competent researchers in the Western academic environment. CA01013ZThe Role Of Effective Supervision In Facilitating Constructive Volitional Behaviour In Doctoral StudyRobert Cantwell and Jill Scevak, The University of NewcastleIn this paper we draw on supervisor interview data to illustrate mechanisms by which effective supervision is able to both proactively and reactively mediate volitional challenges faced by doctoral candidates in the course of their candidature. Volitional control refers to the manner in which individuals enact behaviours to protect intentions or goals in learning. Following Pintrich (1999), we examine potential volitional challenges from four perspectives: threats or challenges to motivation, to positive emotions and mood, to constructive intellectual behaviour and to a positive physical and psychological environment. In addition, we suggest that these challengers may reflect at least three levels of concern - at a distal level relating to overall candidature at a medial level relating to major episodes within the doctoral experience, and at a proximal level relating to specific task activity. We speculate that, in addition to providing intellectual and procedural support, effective supervision also includes an affective support role. There is little doubt that negative affect - whether inwardly or outwardly directed - impacts significantly both on the preparedness of the candidate to commit to aspects of the doctoral task and on the likelihood of the candidate completing in a timely manner. Mapping supervisor comments on to a four by three matrix of Pintrich's four domains of volitional control and the levels of volitional concern, we provide evidence of supervisor actions designed to facilitate constructive volitional control behaviours by candidates. CA03014ZPerformance Assessment In Doctoral Study: A FrameworkRobert Cantwell and Neryl Jeanneret, The University of NewcastleRecently, the University of Newcastle proposed a series of guidelines for the examination of doctorates in the performing and creative arts. The guidelines indicate that a doctorate in these fields may consist of a combination of creative work and dissertation. In the realm of music, the creative endeavour is expected to consist of, in the case of performance, "a sequence of between four to six one hour recitals or equivalent", and in the case of composition, "a full-length opera or symphonic score, or a portfolio of compositions of equivalent scope or depth for smaller forces". In this paper we address the examination implications of the dual assessment of the creative work and the dissertation. In particular, we draw on previous theoretical work in the assessment of senior secondary school music (Cantwell & Jeanneret, in press) to propose an examination framework that may provide a common metric across the different media, whilst at the same time allowing for both the identification and quantification of the notion of contribution at the doctoral level. CH03029Z Paper"Cultural Conflicts": Ph.D Students From China vs Australian Supervisors in Research TrainingShen Chen, Doug Absalom and Allyson Holbrook, The University of NewcastleAs a result of globalisation, Australian universities are taking increasing numbers of international students. Over the past decades there has been a substantial expansion in the provision of both undergraduate and postgraduate programs for Asian students at universities all over Australia. Students of Chinese cultural heritage are listed as the highest number of overseas student enrolments. Recently the number of research students from China is increasing. The difficulties encountered by students from China in adjusting to the new learning environment in Australia have drawn increasing attention form Australia academics. One of the crucial issues in training Ph.D students from China is that there is a cultural gap of expectations between the students and their supervisors. This paper is based on the outcome of a research investigating specific barriers to effective communication and interaction between Chinese students and their Australian supervisors. It identifies some major problems and "cultural conflicts" faced by Chinese students in adapting the new culture of research in Australia. The significance of the finding will be discussed in terms of how to improve the quality of research training and supervision in multicultural education settings at Australian universities. CO03033ZTowards an EdD of Professional PracticeKennece Coombe, Charles Sturt University and Brian Paltridge, University of SydneyIn a political atmosphere within the Australian Higher Education wherein universities are punished for non-completions in Research Higher Degrees, universities across the board are actively pursuing programs that seek to maximise student success. The Doctor of Education program devised collaboratively between Charles Sturt University and the University of Sydney is one such development. The new doctoral program has three distinct phases. Phase 1 is a positioning phase where candidates are introduced to notions of understanding and researching professional practice and builds towards the development of a functional research proposal which is defended at a colloquium before the candidate proceeds further into the program. The second phase is the one in which research is undertaken through two or three related projects which were identified in the proposal. The program reaches its completion through an exegesis which binds together the theories and new knowledge arising from the projects. DA03011ZHitting The Ground Running: Issues For Doctoral Students In Education And The Creative ArtsRachel Darell and Susan Harriman, University of Technology, SydneyThis paper presents the journey being undertaken by a group of education doctoral students at a NSW university. Chance encounters by members of this group revealed a number of shared key issues despite their doctoral studies spanning a wide range of areas such as information technology, classroom environments, imaginary friends and high school selection. In addition it focuses on specific issues faced by a members of the group working in the area of the creative arts. Some of the general issues addressed in this paper include overcoming the solitary nature of doctoral study, building networks, gaining access to resources within the university setting, as well as identifying the importance of establishing a strong fellowship of beginning researchers at an early stage of study. Specific creative arts issues addressed include the perceived need to conform to traditional research structures to meet the steps to achieve a doctorate. This paper also highlights how these issues relate to both full-time and part-time students. As the group has been meeting formally since early 2003, this paper will present some of the solutions that have helped to smooth this journey as well as assisting those new students just beginning to hit the ground running. DA03032Z ® PaperHigher degree examination in the Creative ArtsKerry Dally, Allyson Holbrook, Anne Graham, Miranda Lawry and Sid Bourke, University of NewcastleThe PhD is distinguished from other university degrees by the emphasis placed on the significance of its contribution to knowledge. The qualities associated with this contribution can differ between disciplines and fields, but there are also strong similarities. One means of identifying thesis benchmarks and qualities is to identify what examiners look for in the PhD thesis. Disciplines are not static and expectations can change over time. Moreover some disciplines, such as the creative arts, did not put forward candidates for the PhD until recently and are still developing their baseline expectations on PhD process and quality. This paper describes an established mixed-methodological approach which was previously employed to analyse the content of 603 written PhD examination reports from a range of disciplines including the arts, social sciences and science. The results from a cross-section of these previous analyses will be compared to a small sample of recently acquired Fine Art examination reports. The similarities and differences between Fine Art examination reports and reports from other disciplines are investigated. Drawing on the Fine Art examination reports as well as guidelines provided to Fine Art examiners, this paper also aims to identify emerging issues and themes from the creative arts examination process that can be explored in subsequent interviews with Fine Art examiners. ED03036Z PaperDesign Research and the five-legged dogAntony Eddison & Michael Dickinson University of NewcastleIn design there are several ways of defining 'research' and there exist several traditions as to how research should be carried out and to what degree research training should be given. From a developing personal perspective, this paper examines some these issues. The ideas have evolved over the past few years following many discussions with colleagues and those involved in both research training and professional practice, undergraduate and postgraduate students of design and perceptions from those working in disciplines other than design in the UK, Europe and Australia. Some of these issues are then set in the working context of the discipline of design at The University of Newcastle that now finds itself within a new school that includes the discipline of Information Technology, the school being one of five that make up a new Faculty of Science and Information Technology. These alliances provide for many opportunities, however there are many inherent issues, particularly at RHD level where knowledge and methodology has a tradition of being viewed from a scientific perspective. The paper makes reference to a parallel situation in the very recent past from a QAA Subject Review of a similar school at a university in the UK with which the author was closely involved. The paper concludes with a call for greater ongoing communication between schools of Art and Design in Australia on their research activities and issues and proposes a catalyst project that may well be of assistance in this. EV03007Z ® PaperA brief review of PhDs in Creative and Performing Arts in AustraliaTerry Evans, Peter Macauley and Karen Tregenza, Deakin University and Margot Pearson, Australian National UniversityThis paper reports on an aspect of a pilot project in 2003 by the authors comprising a bibliographic analysis of all (42,000+) Australian PhDs. The pilot work is both a data and methodological basis for a larger project that investigates the nature and development of PhDs in Australia as they evolved in the context of economic, social and educational changes. This paper reviews the evidence from the bibliographic data held in library catalogues of PhDs in each Australian university. It provides an overview of the first instances, locations and frequencies of PhDs in the creative and performing arts in Australia, fields which are relatively new to doctoral study and which pose challenges in terms of doctoral pedagogy and scholarship. This is contextualised in terms of the rise of the modern university and the new professional doctorates in the creative arts. EV03030ZGuidelines for Best Practice in Doctoral EducationTerry Evans, Deakin University and Leonie Rennie Curtin University of TechnologyIn recent years the Australian Council of Deans and Directors of Graduate Studies has become increasingly concerned about the quality and standards of doctorates, that is, PhDs, professional and other doctorates. It has become clear that PhD programs are not always of sufficient quality and that some PhD students do not receive a quality doctoral experience and outcome. Similarly, the Council has been concerned about the quality of some Australian professional and other doctorates. As a result of these concerns, the Council established a working party to prepare a set of guidelines for best practice in Australian doctoral programs. The draft guidelines are consistent with the Australian Qualifications Framework and were reviewed and refined at the last Council meeting in May, 2003. In this presentation, an overview of the guidelines is offered for further discussion and advice to the Council. FI03018Z PaperAn Eye On The Prize: Fourth Year Honours Students, Thesis Writing And The Group Supervision ProcessPhil Fitzsimmons, Raelene Anderson, Barbra McKenzie and Honglin Chen, University of WollongongThis presentation discusses a project arose as a result of an 'Open Forum on Supervision' at the University of Wollongong (September 2002), where the discussion centred on the need to explore different forms of doctoral supervision as it seems that the current focus on supervision of research students across Australasia as a whole is in a current state of flux (Mullins 2002). It would appear that although the supervision of thesis writing students has been a natural and accepted part of an academics working life, little is really known about the actual process, the conditions which underpin optimal supervision or the nature of alternative formats to the typical one on one nature of the process. As stated by Tinkler & Jackson (2000:167), the whole process as it stands is 'shrouded in mystery'. Thus, in an attempt to explore possible alternatives to all research programs, and mentor possible future doctoral into the research process, a team or a 'community' based approach was set up by the Education faculty. The specific aims were to provide both individual and group mentoring while simultaneously providing an avenue for "openness, and a spirit of inquiry, all of which are desirable traits for educational researchers, whether beginners or otherwise" (Pallas 2002;9). This paper discusses how the students involved in a 'community of learners' approach have reacted to the initial stages of this new model and the epistemological diversity they encountered. FL03026ZIlluminating the TextAdele Flood, RMIT UniversityIn this paper I will investigate ideas of practice based research from the interrelated perspectives of being an artist, a writer and a researcher. It will draw heavily upon my recently submitted PhD thesis titled Common Threads and from a series of images that were created independently but parallel to the ideas I was investigating within the research. It will explore ideas of identity, memory and will investigate
This kind of interrogation of processes is a way of beginning to engage in practice based research. The very act of making or creating art works involves such interrogation both implicit and explicit. GA03038Z PaperA Doctorate by Definition:
|