"You didn't tell us what to do" Teacher Perceptions of Action Research Julie Arthur, Bob Bingham, Peter Ireland Colleen McQueen, Nora Swain Paper presented at the AARE Conference Newcastle Nov.27thİDec 1st 1994 Abstract The traditional expert delivery model of provision for inservice training with teachers has been shown to have limitations for long term understanding and professional growth. As an alternative, a facilitated action research program offers the opportunity for teachers to identify areas of interest and their associated individual professional development needs. Such a program has been implemented throughout 1994 by Australian Catholic University personnel with a cohort of teachers (Kİ12) from six Catholic Schools in a provincial town. Teachers worked on research projects as follows: * academic motivation * pastoral care * parent teacher partnerships The perceptions of teachers are reported. It was found that after initial reservations and uncertainty with the action research process, teachers found their involvement to be of great benefit both professionally and personally. This paper reports on the process of action research as undertaken in this project and on the findings of research on teacher thinking. You didn't tell us what to do. Teacher Perception of Action Research Arthur, et al Š Paper presented at AARE Conference, 1994 Introduction Recent attention has been paid to the nature and extent of the professionalisation of teaching and the need for lifeİlong teacher education (KremerİHayon, 1987; Meere, 1992). According to Korthagen (1993), this has resulted in an increased focus on reflection and reflective teaching. There is a growing demand for teachers at both preİservice and inİservice levels in education to develop reflective capacities in order to complement knowledge and technical capacities (Valli, 1992; Zeichner & Liston, 1987). Valli (1992) found teacher comfort with reflective activities to be influenced by their perceptions of the function, value, and nature of the process. Schon (1983) similarly supports the notion that reflection is the process by which the knowledge base of effective professional practice is constructed and refined. Professional development education has a fundamental aim to improve practice not just to produce knowledge "by developing the practitioner's capacity for discrimination and judgement in particular, complex human situations" (Elliott, 1991, p. 52). Inservice training of school based teachers traditionally has occurred through the transmission of preselected content to largely passive recipients. Adult learning principles suggest that education is a good deal more than mere learning. It requires the active involvement of the educand in the process of learning, with the concept of active learning as the crucial element of this theory. When applied to professional development such principles result in an emphasis on learners being actively engaged with the content and processes of his/her learning in such a way that professional development does in fact occur. A facilitated action research program is one approach which meets this challenge. Kİ12 Professional Development Program: Parent Teacher Partnerships through Personal Development Education The pilot project ran from April to November, 1994, with teachers from Catholic schools in a provincial New South Wales town. With a focus on professional development and reflective practices, the challenge presented in the Kİ12 Professional Development Program was to involve classroom teachers in an action research process through which they could identify ways to work towards partnerships with parents. The action research approach of the project encouraged collaborative reflection and provided opportunities for investigating a problem of professional practice. (Appendix A is an outline of the process of the Kİ12 Professional Development Program). Action research is a form Šof professional development to which teachers are unaccustomed and with which they may be uncomfortable. This research aims to report on teacher perceptions of involvement in the action learning process, attitudes towards the content of the project and the nature of the process itself. Methodology A qualitative research approach was adopted to reveal the experiences of participants as these are expressed through diaries and interviews. Qualitative techniques recognise the reflective character of educational research. Such research also seeks to understand the persons involved, their behaviour and perceptions, and the influence of the physical and psychological environment or context on them. Such is the focus in this research: to understand the perceptions of teachers as they undertake action research in the area of parent teacher partnerships. This paper reports on one section of the research. Participants Teachers from six Catholic parish schools three primary and three campuses of the secondary school were invited to volunteer to be involved in the project facilitated by two lecturers from the Australian Catholic University. The first Twilight Seminar was held in May to introduce the project. Of the 33 teachers who initially attended the introductory seminar, 24 expressed a willingness to continue the process with 14 teachers completing the project, seven from primary schools, four from the regional high school 7İ10, two from the senior secondary school and one from the vocational college. Of the participants, six were male and eight female. The teaching experiences ranged from two years to over twenty years experience across diverse settings in Australia and overseas. Data Collection. Data were collected from journals, journal interviews and followİup interviews. The analysis of the data followed a grounded theory approach (Strauss & Corbin, 1990) in which data collection, analysis and theory stand in a reciprocal relationship with each other. Journals were maintained by the participants throughout the process. Following an initial handout to the teachers about journal writing, journals were collected, photocopied and responded to three times through the project. Interviews were audio taped and subsequently transcribed. The journal entries and typed transcripts were analysed for content and style. The data were read again to identify specific themes following Benjamin (1990, p.14) who has described a theme as "any set of words, phrases or sentences which coherently reflected a specific underlying meaning, feeling or activity." Š Findings The information yielded by analysis of the data highlighted emergent issues and themes. These related to initial reactions to the process, perceptions of the role of triads, teacher image, perceptions of parents. In reporting the findings, attention has been given to relating perceptions to specific sections of the process. For the most part participant's words have been used to illustrate the findings. These are written in italics. Introductory Session: He told us he'd like us all togo. Participants attended the introductory twilight seminar in response to an invitation to all teachers in the parish. The initial motivation for partaking in the pilot project was found to vary widely. For some it was seen as a chance for personal and professional renewal with other colleagues in an area of their choosing and interest. The cream of the parish teaching profession is here. If for no other reason, this is a great idea. A chance to exchange ideas with people I have been meaning to catch up with for a long time. For others the reasons were pragmatic. I am on a contract and this may help me get a full time job. Some teachers reported a reluctance at first, but attended because of perceived pressure fromschool administration. On this campus it was almost a case of, you know you see it in the movies, that they call for volunteers and everyone else steps back so far and one is left. Whereas for some of the teachers attending the seminar there was personal choice and motivation, for others it was an obligation to their principal. All arrived without a clear idea of either the process of action research or of the exact nature of the inservice content. Perceptions of Action Research: You didn't tell us what todo The preliminary invitation identified parent teacher partnerships and personal development as key issues in an action research based inservice program. The initial session of the program had a commonly identified response. Participants varyingly reported they were confused and unsure in relation to the process of the inservice project, in addition to the content of the project. Typically these were either journal comments: Being a structured type of person I had hoped for clearer directions as to theclassroom teacher's role in this project. I was left wondering if the expectations were relatively simple or if I had missed the point altogether. or interview comments: I felt confused ŠAt first I was not quite sure. I like to know what the goal is. I thought it was going to be more of an inservice, straight into it, whereas it wasn't. A reİemergent concern of participants in the early stages of the project was the motivation of the researchers İ what we would get out of it. Not sure what you want and what you are expecting This uncertainty was linked to uncertainty of what researchers expected of the participants. Ownership was identified by one participant when referring to his action plan. I want it to become my project within your scheme. Identification of area for action plan: All at sea The identification of a problem area on which to focus their action plans occurred at the second twilight seminar. This was a difficult task for teachers as was coming to terms with the process of a form of inservice which differed from their previous experiences. Repeatedly the comment was made that teachers were unsure of what they were to do. I'm still not quite sure about a specific objective for the action research plan. The participants reported being used to attending inservice which would give them a list of information, a recipe for them to follow and lots of good ideas for teaching. In this project, teachers were offered control of their professional development through identification of a need they had and planning how they could address this need. Teacher thinking about their problems and action plans was facilitated through the interactions afforded them through the whole group sessions conducted by the facilitators and subsequent triad meetings. Through talking it seemed more like something I wanted todo. Our first meeting was better than I thought, the other members helped me to clarify my ideas and reshape them as well as offer other suggestions. Casual conversations, it was just a couple of casual words, also were reported as significant in the decision making associated with problem and action plan identification. A proforma for listening to the ideas of others gave the listening teachers some prompts for areas in which to question their colleagues as part of facilitating the communication process with people who were essentially strangers. Teachers highlighted difficulties of communication, not only between teachers and parents but also among themselves. Implementation Having identified a problem and prepared a plan of action, teachers Šbegan to implement their action plans. The following extracts from case studies highlight the individual nature of action research based professional development. Case Study 1. I was interested in the ParentİTeacher Partnership project to enhance my own personal development and to improve in an area of teaching I had neglected. I have always believed parents are an integral part of the education process but have never given it the time, in thought or action, that it deserves. In choosing a project, I wanted it to be useful , workable and attainable. The idea of a teacher initiated project was more appealing than being given an area of focus. I decided to target my pastoral care class. In having established a good relationship with the students, I decided involvement with the parents would be of benefit to everyone. I wanted the parents to begin to see me as a link into the school. I began with a letter to inform the parents of some of the activities Year 10 would be involved with over the coming months (assessment tasks, subject selection for yr. 11, work experience placements etc.). I invited their involvement in these decisions and suggested they contact me if they had any questions or concerns about these happenings. A more personal contact by phone was made to ensure an understanding of the above mentioned activities and to encourage further communication. Finally a social evening was held with parents and students so that face to face interaction could occur. Opening Communication with Pastoral Care Class Parents:Yr 10 Case Study 2. The initial gathering of teachers and facilitators was a walk into unchartered professional territory. It was the catalyst for many questions. I was curious to know the format of "Action Research" over the next eight months. As a professional development experience I was used to knowing where I was going and what steps had to be taken to get there. This had been my conditioned response in the past. But unfortunately Action Research didn't provide similar immediate satisfaction to my curiosity. Instead its structure was slow in emerging. This was a different model and I was finding that I had no preconditioned mindset to assist my direction. Action research needed clarification at our initial meeting. To me it appeared to rely on the "informal communication and reflection" Šmuch more than the formal model I was used to. In the early stages this didn't sit comfortably with someone who is task oriented. By the end it was achieving more than I had anticipated. From my experiences as a teacher at a Senior College, I had become concerned at the apparent reluctance among most male students to get involved and participate in the school based curricular and coİcurricular activities. The Action Research project offered me a vehicle to address this problem. The opportunity for collaboration with selected parents and students appealed to me. This would help foster the partnership of which we are part by engaging more parents in the total education process. The second twilight meeting I attended gave me a focus for the first time. It also gave me a strategy İ a self styled strategy İ not a text book one. It allowed me to develop a timeİline in which to implement an action plan. It obliged me to engage parents and students as well as other professionals (triad members) from which to gain feedback and refine the process and strategy. My action plan focused on raising the profile of three year 11 male students through the development of strategies and opportunities in collaboration with chosen students and theirparents. Motivation of Boys in a Senior Secondary College Case Study 3. The focus of my research project was to provide opportunities which would aid in the development of a sense of community amongst families, parents and children of my year one class. I chose this focus because as a parent with 7 years of involvement in primary schooling, I felt there were many parents that I didn't know or knew only briefly. I believed that if parents were invited to meet socially on a class basis (with no other agenda e.g. fundraising) from the initial years of their children's schooling, then they would feel more at ease/familiar with each other, their children's friends and teachers. I felt that despite the project being small it had the potential for many positive spinoffs. Parent Teacher Partnerships in Primary School Collaboration in Triads: Confidence to share The third step in the action research process was the formation of triads/ action research teams. Based on the notion that groups bonded together would have a responsibility not solely to themselves to complete the project but also to others, action research teams were formed with small groups of teachers. There was an implicit notion of motivation Šbased on collegiality. The success of the triads varied. All groups reported that time was a difficulty in the regard to the frequency of meetings. Teachers in groups which were on separate campuses reported difficulties in meeting with triad members and related these specifically to being at different schools. Groups that were based on common school levels, that is, all primary teachers reported a greater feeling of satisfaction with the groups than groups formed across school levels, secondary/primary, secondary/senior college. Reasons offered for this included the availability of contact and familiarity with, if not a sharing of, the context and the issues. Where teachers from the same campus were in the same triad group, as occurred at the junior secondary school, teachers reported that frequency of contact increased outside of the triad meetings. This is consistent with the notion of teaming on the run reported by O'Connor (1992), whereby teachers discuss important issues as they think of them and in passing. The seemingly transitory communications that occur as teachers wait for classes or walk to classes gained a new focus for triad members. Instead of the weather, we now talk about our projects or issues related to them. Having several teachers from the one school undertaking the inservice was also seen as much more effective in that a few of us are doing it here so we can start thinking of the school and the ideas applied to the school. The projects give you a starting point. Creating networks started at a basic level of teachers getting to know other teachers. In journal notes, one teacher had described, in an early entry, an interaction with another teacher at the workshop session as working with another lady, she's in year 3. Later in the journal, after triads had been formed, names became used. Familiarity had been established. From working together teachers reported developing a confidence to share and that they didn't feel so alone. The aloneness of teaching is an important consideration in the provision of inservice. The sharing of information became a focal point for some triad groups. Each time they met one or another would report on articles they had read an recommend them to the others. One teacher recorded that triad meetings encouraged members to make a more conscious effort to read different articles. Kormanski and Mozenter (1987) have reported that commitment was an essential element of team formation. This is evidenced throughout the study. Conclusion Teacher reflection on the process of facilitated action research and on their own action plans has been an inherent part of this pilot project. Thus far, data from research in progress Šsuggests that the teachers who remained with the project, having initially found difficulties with a lack of clearly identified end goals, made significant gains in their professional development. For some participants this was in their understanding of parentİteacher relationships whereas others gained skills in practices of communication with parents. Most teachers identified the collaboration and support of action research team members and the outside consultants as pivotal to their continuing with their plans. However the key issue remains the personal significance and control offered teachers in the selection of issues of interest and concern to them. Case Study 1. The project seems very simple but I believe it's a beginning for myself. Through the project I have become more aware of parental involvement and the need for teachers to initiate and encourage parental involvement. There were four of us on staff working on various projects and I believe through our readings, triad meetings and individual projects we now have a greater commitment to involve parents in a more meaningful way. We have discussed possibilities of how parental partnership could be introduced at the beginning of a new school year. There will always be obstacles and the need to evaluate steps taken, but the concept of partnership can only enhance the idea of a shared sense of purpose, respect and trust for one another. The benefits will be forthcoming for the teacher, parent and particularly the student. Opening Communication with Pastoral Care Class Parents:Yr 10 Participants overall reported feeling unsure and confused with their initial involvement in what was for many their first experience with a nonİtraditional approach to inservice training. The following excerpt from a case study serves to summarise such feelings. The action research process is peppered by insecurities. Working against a traditional background of formal professional development which is top down, it challenged me to be more collaborative, made me interact regularly with parents and students with a positive focus, but gave me no direction. However it promoted autonomy in professional development, was eventually satisfying due to its flexibility. It generated its content from parent, student and staff responses or reactions. It evolved to serve specific individual circumstances and included Šparents in an unthreatened scenario to support the strong partnerships towards which we are all working. Bibliography Benjamin, M. (1990). Freshman daily experience: Implications for policy, research and theory. Student Development Monograph Series, Volume 4. Guelph, Canada: University of Guelph. Elliot, J. (1991). Action research for educational change. Milton Keyes: Open UniversityPress. Korthagen, F.A.J. (1993). Two models of reflection. Teacher and Teacher Education, 9(3), pp.317İ326. KremerİHayon, L. (1987). Women teachers' professional development: General and personal perspectives. Educational Review, 39 (1),pp.3İ13. Meere, P.V. (1992). Learning to be a teacher wholistically. Paper presented at the 12th Annual International Seminar for Teacher Education, Armidale,April. Schon, D.A. (1983). The reflective practitioner: How professionals think in action. NewYork: Basic Books. Strauss, A. & Corbin, J. (1990). Basics of qualitative research: Grounded theory, procedures and techniques. Newbury Perk, CA.:Sage. O'Connor, B. (1991). Interagency teamwork: realities and challenges. Paper presented at the 15th National Conference of the Australian association of Special Education. Brisbane, University of Queensland. 28 September. Valli, L. (Ed.) (1992). Reflective teacher education: Cases and critiques. New York: State University of New York Press. Zeichner, K.M. & Liston, D.P. (1987). Teaching student teachers to reflect. Harvard Educational Review. 57, 23İ48. Appendix A Action Research There were three distinct strands to the Kİ12 Professional Development Program: 1. Teacher Twilight Seminars 2. Action Research by teachers 3. Action Research Teams Each of these strands offered challenges to teachers as they engaged in the actionresearch process. 1. Twilight Seminars Following an initial Twilight Seminar, subsequent seminars focused on Šaction research methodology and the nature of parentİteacher partnerships. In addition to the process development for their identified professional needs, teachers requested and were given specific input about parent teacher communication. Folios of readings related to the topics of the inservice were supplied to each school cohort. 2. Action Research Steps in the action research process are as follows: 1. Teachers identify a key issue they wish to address at the classroom level of decision making. 2. An action plan is formulated to address the issue and implemented by the teacher. 3. Teachers reflect on the implementation process and evaluate their plans, making changes where required. 4. Revised plans are implemented. Action plans in this project have been written in the following areas: Motivation of Senior Students Parent Participation in Personal Development Student Evaluation and Parent Teacher Information Building Relationships with Parents: Breaking down the barriers Development of self esteem 3. Action Research Teams/Triads Action research teams were formed with small groups of teachers. The aim of the teams was to provide collegial support with a timetable of support meetings arranged by the participants. The initial action research session and the subsequent first team meeting were facilitated by the researchers with following meetings alternating between team self facilitation and support from the external facilitator. DISCUSSION PAPER AND CASE STUDY ON AN ACTION RESEARCH PROJECT Peter J. Ireland Campus Principal MacKILLOP SENIOR COLLEGE PORT MACQUARIE NSW December 1994 Abstract This paper reports on an action research plan undertaken as part of the Kİ12 Professional Development Program: Parent Teacher Partnerships through Personal Development Education. The program was implemented in Catholic schools, Kİ12, in Port Macquarie, NSW, from May to November, 1994. The program involved twilight seminars, action research Šand collaboration with teachers in action research teams. Professional support was provided by Julie Arthur, from the Australian Catholic University, McAuley Campus, (Brisbane), the project leader. What about the Boys? A Discussion Paper Peter Ireland Introduction Many recent reports allude to the theory that, in the postİcompulsory sector, adequate masculine development among teenage boys fails without the specific application of positive intervention from male role models. Young men heading toward collaborative workplace environments, meaningful relationships within marriage and families can no longer afford to be emotionally expressive deserts. All this should be balanced by the realisation that young men (teenagers) need relationships with other men in deep and significant ways which go far beyond playing sports and having a beer together. So the challenge we have in schools is to broaden the narrow stereotypic by which we force potentially generous and able young men to virtually ignore or entomb their emotional and spiritual impulses. It is no longer sufficient for schools to address pastoral care in the narrow traditional sense of wholistic development. Specific strategies are needed which focus on the specific needs of adolescents, with regard to the particular gender based differences (Connell, 1989). It is time for developmental needs to be considered within the area of pastoral care. It is also recognised that such an approach cannot succeed without the development of partnerships between parents andteachers. The outcome of such a focus will be that the boys will take up many more opportunities for personal growth at school than they currently do. In other words the present situation is inhibiting their participation in valuable learning experiences beyond the prescribed syllabus. If the current focus on institutionalised maleness continues there will be continued denial of the optimum development of the mental health and skill building of boys even more fundamentally than has occurred with the self esteem and achievements of girls in Australian society. The Study: "What about the Boys?" Background My experience in single sex and coİeducational schools particularly is that regardless of an obvious reason, e.g. lack of appropriate male stereotypes, boys don't join in readily, miss out on valuable learning and growing experiences and consequently short change their potential. Anecdotal evidence from exİstudents suggests that female students reflect positively on their involvement in coİcurricular activities. "I'm glad I had a go atthis and that while I was at MacKillop because it's been so useful to me at University or at work". While a common trend among male exİstudents is to say "I wish I had been involved in this and that at school because I could have really used it now". This background provides not only a link, but also a good reason to raise the profile of teenage boys in schools. It behoves us to work with parents and students to devise strategies which bring about not only an attitudinal change but also a change in practices which will see boys get the most out of all developmental opportunities available to them at MacKillop Senior College: a true wholistic education. The recent experience among the Year 11 and 12 male cohorts at MacKillop Senior College clearly identifies a reluctance/hesitation among most male students to: 1. get involved and participate in school based curriculum and coİcurriculum activities 2. value education in the wholistic sense and all its associated dimensions in the senior secondary years. An assessment of the roles played by male and female students at MacKillop Senior College reveals that on the whole the Senior girls are much more involved in skill building experiences within the curriculum and coİcurricular activities. The pattern in recent years is that the senior girls are the `doers', the `givers' and the major participants in an around the College with the possible exception of sport. 1. Young Achievers Australia Scheme (85% female) 2. School Council 50%, 50% but less male initiative Š3. Fundraising for Charities 80% female 4. Mock Trial Representative Team 100% female 5. College Debating Team 100% female 6. Public Speaking Competitions 100% female 7. Literary Competitions 60% females 8. Choir Group 90% female 9. Use of library in lunch 70% female 10.Volunteers for Liturgies 80% female In these areas the boys are happy to take an insignificant background role at best, with the exception of just a few. The boys are outnumbered when they do participate, but in many cases show little interest in being involved at all. The irony is that the girls do it İ seize the opportunity and grow by the experiences and the boys lose out. In fact the majority of boys seem happy that they are out of the limelight when it comes to these activities both in and out of the classroom. A significant and measurable indicator of gender based achievement is the lower performance by males at MacKillop Senior College relative to females in the Higher School Certificate. This is a tangible indicator which can be supported with empirical evidence. e.g. In 1993 females scored on average another 17 marks in Tertiary Entrance Ranks than males. There was a higher proportion of males clustered at the bottom end of the mark range. Girls outperformed boys in all 15 H.S.I.E. courses, in 4 Creative Arts courses, Languages, Biology and English. The issue of raising the male profile among the 16,17 and 18 year olds at MacKillop Senior College and the esteem and skills which come from profile raising activities/experiences is tied up more with: an attitudinal change, rather than a lack of ability In fact it is my belief that until young males can be parented and nurtured more effectively by their teachers and parents to effect a positive and willing attitudinal change İ their performance across academic, social, vocational and life management areas will remain under the maximum potential. Progress in making the attitudinal change will involve a strong partnership between teachers and parents provided they are rounded resourceful people equally in touch with their emotionally accepting side as well as their assertive socially achieving side. Against this background, an action plan was devised based on the provision of opportunities to effect attitudinal change in selected boys with a resultant increase in skill building opportunities for personal growth and development at MacKillop. The Action Plan The action research plan was devised Šwith a view to clarifying the current situation with regard to male student involvement in coİcurricular activities and subsequently devising `workable strategies' with parents which will raise the profile of boys in a positive way. I selected three Year 11 students who I know would be in my Year 12 Economics class in 1995. This afforded me the chance to keep in regular daily contact with them if necessary and with small numbers kept it simple and manageable for me. Strategies involved meetings with the boys, and meetings with boys and their parents. Timeİline August Identify 3 male students, make contact with them and their parents September Meet with parents and students October Evaluate and reassess action plan November Evaluation and planning for 1995 Implementation Meetings with boys The first meeting took place on 9th August on the courtyard lawn. At this meeting I asked each of the students for their impressions of what we had begun as a Trial Project. Their reactions gave me enough evidence to form the opinion that although they were aware of the possible embarrassment factor, or nervousness/self consciousness, they still enjoyed the prospect that I was interested enough to choose them as trial candidates. (This was a positive side effectalready). Their comments reflected interest in the venture although one described the project as "discovering more about what I'm not good at". Discussion focused on reasons for reluctance to attempt things they were not good at. The following were identified by the boys: 1. lack of acceptable male role models 2. insecurity, low confidence and low self esteem 3. peer pressure within the male cohort working against involvement 4. physical and emotional immaturity relative to females at this age 5. It's too tempting to take the soft and lazy option 6. The male movement ("Male strategies") is still in its infancy and is not yet delivering asimilar outcome 7. the girls are even more focused these days at school and college because they know that in Šmany cases they will have to look after their own financial futures. This may be a positive outcome working in favour of the senior girls on the back of 30 years of thefeminist movement. The three boys left the meeting aware that they will be encouraged on future occasions to volunteer for activities or specific roles around the College which will: * improve their profiles as individuals; * provide confidence and learning through experience; * perhaps lead to a greater male participation. Subsequently meetings included: 1. discussion on boys strategies 2. comparison with girls level of involvement 3. reading articles 4. suggesting opportunities for skill building among each other 5. discussion for emotional readiness stages Meetingswith parents Before devising strategies or providing opportunities for the boys, a meeting was held with the parents to clarify the benefits of greater involvement and participation. The following comments were made by parents: "This will be good for him because he is used to sitting on the sideline and letting his sisters take the from stage in most things. If he can gain more confidence he might show more of a lead and initiative", Student No.1 (BW) " This will be good for him because he tends to be shy and gets embarrassed easily if he has to do something which raises his profile". Student No.2 (HL) "This might be good for him because although he has lots of ability, he only does what he has to İ the bare minimum". Student No.3 (MJ) The reaction from the parents was for the most part interested and positive. There were difficulties in arranging common times to meet with the result that contact was more often by phone. Student No 3 is from a single parent family. Although supportive of the project, his mother wishes to keep her distance from the school. Evaluation When the 3 boys began to volunteer I could really see a sign of progress. My subjective assessment so far is that it appears to be leading the way for other boys to participate in further skill building experiences. In other words, I think participation is gaining acceptance. Other staff, particularly the Year 11 Coİordinator and Pastoral teachers have Šsupported the trial project through providing extra opportunities for the selected students. Activities in which students have been involved include: acting as Usher at the Year 12 Graduation Ball andPrizegiving, chairing a full College Assembly, leading the College in prayer The active participation of the three boys in the coİcurricular activities of the school has increased over the period of the action research. It could also be said that there has been a corresponding change in attitude and motivation which has resulted in the increased participation. Where to from here The process will continue for the remainder of the year and into 1995. It is planned to extend the project to include a new cohort of boys from the incoming Year 11. Further contact with parents will include a separate Seminar/Workshop for parents and sons next year. Parent evaluation of the project will also be sought as a means to further understanding between parents and teachers. Raising the awareness of staff is also a priority area. The aim of this project is that through the specific strategies applied in this process there will be a positive effect in changing male student attitudes to involvement and success in the coİcurricular life of the school. If this is achieved there will be strong evidence to suggest that provision of pastoral care for students in the PostŞCompulsory sector needs a redefinition if the needs of adolescent males are to be met. Bibliography Connell, R.W. (1989). Cool guys, swots and wimps. The interplay of masculinity and education. Oxford Education Review. 15(3), pp. 291İ303